RESUMEN
Mitigation of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from international travel is a priority. We evaluated the effectiveness of travellers being required to quarantine for 14-days on return to England in Summer 2020. We identified 4,207 travel-related SARS-CoV-2 cases and their contacts, and identified 827 associated SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Overall, quarantine was associated with a lower rate of contacts, and the impact of quarantine was greatest in the 16-20 age-group. 186 SARS-CoV-2 genomes were sufficiently unique to identify travel-related clusters. Fewer genomically-linked cases were observed for index cases who returned from countries with quarantine requirement compared to countries with no quarantine requirement. This difference was explained by fewer importation events per identified genome for these cases, as opposed to fewer onward contacts per case. Overall, our study demonstrates that a 14-day quarantine period reduces, but does not completely eliminate, the onward transmission of imported cases, mainly by dissuading travel to countries with a quarantine requirement.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Enfermedades Transmisibles Importadas/prevención & control , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Enfermedades Transmisibles Importadas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Importadas/transmisión , Trazado de Contacto , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Genoma Viral/genética , Genómica , Evaluación del Impacto en la Salud , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/clasificación , Viaje/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermedad Relacionada con los ViajesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The major medical and social challenge of the 21st century is COVID-19, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Critical issues include the rate at which the coronavirus spreads and the effect of quarantine measures and population vaccination on this rate. Knowledge of the laws of the spread of COVID-19 will enable assessment of the effectiveness and reasonableness of the quarantine measures used, as well as determination of the necessary level of vaccination needed to overcome this crisis. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to establish the laws of the spread of COVID-19 and to use them to develop a mathematical model to predict changes in the number of active cases over time, possible human losses, and the rate of recovery of patients, to make informed decisions about the number of necessary beds in hospitals, the introduction and type of quarantine measures, and the required threshold of vaccination of the population. METHODS: This study analyzed the onset of COVID-19 spread in countries such as China, Italy, Spain, the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, France, and Germany based on publicly available statistical data. The change in the number of COVID-19 cases, deaths, and recovered persons over time was examined, considering the possible introduction of quarantine measures and isolation of infected people in these countries. Based on the data, the virus transmissibility and the average duration of the disease at different stages were evaluated, and a model based on the principle of recursion was developed. Its key features are the separation of active (nonisolated) infected persons into a distinct category and the prediction of their number based on the average duration of the disease in the inactive phase and the concentration of these persons in the population in the preceding days. RESULTS: Specific values for SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility and COVID-19 duration were estimated for different countries. In China, the viral transmissibility was 3.12 before quarantine measures were implemented and 0.36 after these measures were lifted. For the other countries, the viral transmissibility was 2.28-2.76 initially, and it then decreased to 0.87-1.29 as a result of quarantine measures. Therefore, it can be expected that the spread of SARS-CoV-2 will be suppressed if 56%-64% of the total population becomes vaccinated or survives COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: The quarantine measures adopted in most countries are too weak compared to those previously used in China. Therefore, it is not expected that the spread of COVID-19 will stop and the disease will cease to exist naturally or owing to quarantine measures. Active vaccination of the population is needed to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Furthermore, the required specific percentage of vaccinated individuals depends on the magnitude of viral transmissibility, which can be evaluated using the proposed model and statistical data for the country of interest.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/transmisión , Modelos Teóricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Salud Global , Humanos , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudenciaAsunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Gobierno Federal , Humanos , Política , Salud Pública , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Gobierno Estatal , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The SARS-CoV-2 Delta (Pango lineage B.1.617.2) variant of concern spread globally, causing resurgences of COVID-19 worldwide1,2. The emergence of the Delta variant in the UK occurred on the background of a heterogeneous landscape of immunity and relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Here we analyse 52,992 SARS-CoV-2 genomes from England together with 93,649 genomes from the rest of the world to reconstruct the emergence of Delta and quantify its introduction to and regional dissemination across England in the context of changing travel and social restrictions. Using analysis of human movement, contact tracing and virus genomic data, we find that the geographic focus of the expansion of Delta shifted from India to a more global pattern in early May 2021. In England, Delta lineages were introduced more than 1,000 times and spread nationally as non-pharmaceutical interventions were relaxed. We find that hotel quarantine for travellers reduced onward transmission from importations; however, the transmission chains that later dominated the Delta wave in England were seeded before travel restrictions were introduced. Increasing inter-regional travel within England drove the nationwide dissemination of Delta, with some cities receiving more than 2,000 observable lineage introductions from elsewhere. Subsequently, increased levels of local population mixing-and not the number of importations-were associated with the faster relative spread of Delta. The invasion dynamics of Delta depended on spatial heterogeneity in contact patterns, and our findings will inform optimal spatial interventions to reduce the transmission of current and future variants of concern, such as Omicron (Pango lineage B.1.1.529).
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , COVID-19/virología , Ciudades/epidemiología , Trazado de Contacto , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Genoma Viral/genética , Humanos , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/crecimiento & desarrollo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Viaje/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Using the synthetic control method, we construct counterfactuals for what would have happened if Sweden had imposed a lockdown during the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic. We consider eight different indicators, including a novel one that we construct by adjusting recorded daily COVID-19 deaths to account for weakly excess mortality. Correcting for data problems and re-optimizing the synthetic control for each indicator, we find that a lockdown would have had sizable effects within one week. The much longer delay estimated by two previous studies focusing on the number of positives cases is mainly driven by the extremely low testing frequency that prevailed in Sweden in the first months of the epidemic. This result appears relevant for choosing the timing of future lockdowns and highlights the importance of looking at several indicators to derive robust conclusions. We also find that our novel indicator is effective in correcting errors in the COVID-19 deaths series and that the quantitative effects of the lockdown are stronger than previously estimated.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Política de Salud , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , Certificado de Defunción , Humanos , Suecia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
We study the problem of synthesizing lockdown policies-schedules of maximum capacities for different types of activity sites-to minimize the number of deceased individuals due to a pandemic within a given metropolitan statistical area (MSA) while controlling the severity of the imposed lockdown. To synthesize and evaluate lockdown policies, we develop a multiscale susceptible, infected, recovered, and deceased model that partitions a given MSA into geographic subregions, and that incorporates data on the behaviors of the populations of these subregions. This modeling approach allows for the analysis of heterogeneous lockdown policies that vary across the different types of activity sites within each subregion of the MSA. We formulate the synthesis of optimal lockdown policies as a nonconvex optimization problem and we develop an iterative algorithm that addresses this nonconvexity through sequential convex programming. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed approach by applying it to six of the largest MSAs in the United States. The developed heterogeneous lockdown policies not only reduce the number of deceased individuals by up to 45 percent over a 100 day period in comparison with three baseline lockdown policies that are less heterogeneous, but they also impose lockdowns that are less severe.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Geografía , Cuarentena/métodos , Ciudades , Humanos , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Distanciamiento Físico , Investigadores , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/virología , Prueba de COVID-19 , Trazado de Contacto , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Humanos , Máscaras , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , VentilaciónAsunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Atención Primaria de Salud , Salud Pública , Cuarentena/tendencias , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina Estatal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reino UnidoAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Unión Europea/organización & administración , Cooperación Internacional , Liderazgo , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/economía , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Unión Europea/economía , Unión Europea/estadística & datos numéricos , Calentamiento Global/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calentamiento Global/prevención & control , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pandemias/economía , Neumonía Viral/economía , Política , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuarentena/métodosAsunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Internacionalidad , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Viaje/legislación & jurisprudencia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/transmisión , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Humanos , Epidemiología Molecular , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: With COVID-19 affecting millions of people around the globe, quarantine of international arrivals is a critical public health measure to prevent further disease transmission in local populations. This measure has also been applied in the repatriation of citizens, undertaken by several countries as an ethical obligation and legal responsibility. This article describes the process of planning and preparing for the repatriation operation in South Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interagency collaboration, development of a COVID-19 testing and quarantining protocol, implementing infection prevention and control, and building a specialised health care delivery model were essential aspects of the repatriation operational planning, with a focus on maintaining dignity and wellbeing of the passengers as well as on effective prevention of COVID-19 transmission. From April 2020 to mid-February 2021, more than 14,000 international arrivals travellers have been repatriated under the South Australian repatriation operations. This paper has implications to inform ongoing repatriation efforts in Australia and overseas in a pandemic situation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Control de Infecciones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/transmisión , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Prueba de COVID-19/normas , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Reglamento Sanitario Internacional , Pandemias , Salud Pública/métodos , Cuarentena/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Australia del Sur/epidemiología , ViajeAsunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Obligatorios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sector Privado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vacunación/legislación & jurisprudencia , COVID-19/transmisión , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos Civiles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Gobierno Federal , Educación en Salud , Humanos , Salud Laboral/legislación & jurisprudencia , Religión , Gobierno Estatal , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/provisión & distribución , Canadá/epidemiología , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Máscaras , Distanciamiento Físico , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Factores de Tiempo , Viaje/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Laws not only affect behavior due to changes in material payoffs, but they may also change the perception individuals have of social norms, either by shifting them directly or by providing information on these norms. Using detailed daily survey data and exploiting the introduction of lockdown measures in the UK in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis, we provide causal evidence that the law drastically changed the perception of the norms regarding social distancing behaviors. We show that this effect of laws on perceived norms is mostly driven by an informational channel and that the intervention made perceptions of social norms converge to the actual prevalent norm.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Percepción , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Conducta Social , Normas Sociales , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Community engagement (CE) is an effective public health strategy for improving health outcomes. There is limited published knowledge about effective approaches to CE in ensuring effective responses to COVID-19 throughout lockdowns, travel restrictions and social distancing. In this paper, we contribute to bridging this gap by highlighting experience of CE in Vietnam, specifically focusing on migrant workers in Vietnam. METHODS: A cross-sectional qualitative study design was used with qualitative data collection was carried out during August-October 2020. Two districts were purposefully selected from two large industrial zones. Data was collected using in-depth interviews (n = 36) with individuals and households, migrants and owners of dormitories, industrial zone factory representatives, community representatives and health authorities. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis approach. The study received ethics approval from the Hanoi University Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: The government's response to COVID-19 was spearheaded by the multi-sectoral National Steering Committee for the Prevention and Control of COVID-19, chaired by the Vice Prime Minister and comprised different members from 23 ministries. This structure was replicated throughout the province and local levels and all public and private organizations. Different activities were carried out by local communities, following four key principles of infection control: early detection, isolation, quarantine and hospitalization. We found three key determinants of engagement of migrant workers with COVID-19 prevention and control: availability of resources, appropriate capacity strengthening, transparent and continuous communication and a sense of trust in government legitimacy. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our results support the current literature on CE in infection control which highlights the importance of context and suggests that future CE should consider five key components: multi-sectoral collaboration with a whole-of-community approach to strengthen governance structures with context-specific partnerships; mobilization of resources and decentralization of decision making to encourage self-reliance and building of local capacity; capacity building through training and supervision to local institutions; transparent and clear communication of health risks and sensitization of local communities to improve compliance and foster trust in the government measures; and understanding the urgent needs ensuring of social security and engaging all parts of the community, specifically the vulnerable groups.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Participación de la Comunidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Creación de Capacidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comunicación , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Confianza , Vietnam , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Mitigation measures, including stay-at-home orders and public mask wearing, together with routine public health interventions such as case investigation with contact tracing and immediate self-quarantine after exposure, are recommended to prevent and control the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (1-3). On March 11, the first COVID-19 case in Delaware was reported to the Delaware Division of Public Health (DPH). The state responded to ongoing community transmission with investigation of all identified cases (commencing March 11), issuance of statewide stay-at-home orders (March 24-June 1), a statewide public mask mandate (from April 28), and contact tracing (starting May 12). The relationship among implementation of mitigation strategies, case investigations, and contact tracing and COVID-19 incidence and associated hospitalization and mortality was examined during March-June 2020. Incidence declined by 82%, hospitalization by 88%, and mortality by 100% from late April to June 2020, as the mask mandate and contact tracing were added to case investigations and the stay-at-home order. Among 9,762 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases reported during March 11-June 25, 2020, two thirds (6,527; 67%) of patients were interviewed, and 5,823 (60%) reported completing isolation. Among 2,834 contacts reported, 882 (31%) were interviewed and among these contacts, 721 (82%) reported completing quarantine. Implementation of mitigation measures, including mandated mask use coupled with public health interventions, was followed by reductions in COVID-19 incidence and associated hospitalizations and mortality. The combination of state-mandated community mitigation efforts and routine public health interventions can reduce the occurrence of new COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19 , Trazado de Contacto , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Delaware/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Cuarentena , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Canadá , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Historia del Siglo XV , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Cuarentena/historia , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuarentena/psicología , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/prevención & control , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/transmisiónRESUMEN
Background: COVID-19 related stay-at-home (SAH) orders created many economic and social stressors, possibly increasing the risk of drug/alcohol abuse in the community and trauma population.Objectives: Describe changes in alcohol/drug use in traumatically injured patients after SAH orders in California and evaluate demographic or injury pattern changes in alcohol or drug-positive patients.Methods: A retrospective analysis of 11 trauma centers in Southern California (1/1/2020-6/30/2020) was performed. Blood alcohol concentration, urine toxicology results, demographics, and injury characteristics were collected. Patients were grouped based on injury date - before SAH (PRE-SAH), immediately after SAH (POST-SAH), and a historical comparison (3/19/2019-6/30/2019) (CONTROL) - and compared in separate analyses. Groups were compared using chi-square tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables.Results: 20,448 trauma patients (13,634 male, 6,814 female) were identified across three time-periods. The POST-SAH group had higher rates of any drug (26.2% vs. 21.6% and 24.7%, OR = 1.26 and 1.08, p < .001 and p = .035), amphetamine (10.4% vs. 7.5% and 9.3%, OR = 1.43 and 1.14, p < .001 and p = .023), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (13.8% vs. 11.0% and 11.4%, OR = 1.30 and 1.25, p < .001 and p < .001), and 3,4-methylenedioxy methamphetamine (MDMA) (0.8% vs. 0.4% and 0.2%, OR = 2.02 and 4.97, p = .003 and p < .001) positivity compared to PRE-SAH and CONTROL groups. Alcohol concentration and positivity were similar between groups (p > .05).Conclusion: This Southern California multicenter study demonstrated increased amphetamine, MDMA, and THC positivity in trauma patients after SAH, but no difference in alcohol positivity or blood concentration. Drug prevention strategies should continue to be adapted within and outside of hospitals during a pandemic.